On top of all this, quality of communication can actually be hampered by the amount of data. Plus, face time with patients is hindered. The computer goes down, and it ruins your entire office for the afternoon and drives your patients and staff crazy.”Īdditionally, she said, interoperability is “way too low.” EHRs are not made for the efficiency of physicians but for compliance and billing purposes, she said. “And then, once you get it up and running, it’s still not perfect. Susan Cordes, MD, an otolaryngologist with Ukiah Valley Medical Center in California, said two of the biggest cons of an EHR system are time and money. Seidman moderated, touched on the pros and cons of EHRs, their impact on patient safety, the federal regulations surrounding them, and professionalism in using them. The posters are not alone in their impressions of EHRs. Meaningful use stage 2 requirements are “beyond ridiculous,” said another. A properly designed EHR can be “extremely useful,” but the problem lies with “meaningless use,” wrote another, referring to federal meaningful use incentive requirements. While EHRs might allow for more thorough data acquisition, there is a “risk for mass loss of records,” wrote one poster.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |